AADR vs. MSOX
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AADR returned 18.06%/yr vs -67.24%/yr for MSOX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MSOX.
Performance
AADR vs. MSOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -4.11% return, which is significantly higher than MSOX's -45.54% return.
AADR
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
MSOX
- 1D
- -8.27%
- 1M
- -21.29%
- 6M
- -48.20%
- YTD
- -45.54%
- 1Y
- -16.72%
- 3Y*
- -67.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AADR vs. MSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -4.11% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -4.74% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -45.54% | -51.20% | -87.32% | -39.26% | -76.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and MSOX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022 | 0.22 |
AADR vs. MSOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AADR
MSOX
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Healthcare
AADR
MSOX
-
Basic Materials
AADR
MSOX
-
Financial Services
AADR
MSOX
Industrials
AADR
MSOX
-
Technology
AADR
MSOX
-
Communication Services
AADR
MSOX
-
Energy
AADR
MSOX
-
Consumer Cyclical
AADR
MSOX
-
Utilities
AADR
MSOX
-
Consumer Defensive
AADR
MSOX
-
Real Estate
AADR
-
MSOX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. MSOX — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
MSOX
AADR vs. MSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AADR | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.20 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -0.28 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AADR vs. MSOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum MSOX drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and MSOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -99.75% | +54.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -84.89% | +65.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -98.83% | +78.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.81% | -99.64% | +84.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -89.07% | +79.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.40% | 60.10% | -51.70% |
Volatility
AADR vs. MSOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) is 4.80%, while Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a volatility of 33.67%. This indicates that AADR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 33.67% | -28.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.19% | 111.69% | -93.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 219.64% | -197.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 167.31% | -145.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 167.31% | -145.18% |
AADR vs. MSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADR vs. MSOX - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.84% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and MSOX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOX has higher volatility (33.67%) compared to AADR (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs MSOX's -99.75%.
On 3-year performance, AADR leads with 18.06% vs -67.24% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AADR has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AADR has performed better with a 18.06% return vs -67.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.
AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.
AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while MSOX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.95% for MSOX.
AADR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADR and MSOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer