PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADR vs. HDGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADR vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AADR has outperformed HDGE with an annualized return of 9.28%, while HDGE has yielded a comparatively lower -14.77% annualized return.


AADR

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
0.12%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
9.28%

HDGE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.59%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
-14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADR vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
-1.56%25.63%24.58%18.67%-22.93%6.48%13.13%35.35%-31.55%47.76%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
5.43%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-18.61%-43.47%-36.27%7.53%-15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AADR and HDGE is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

-0.50

The correlation between AADR and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from -0.55 (5 years) to -0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AADR vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AADR
HDGE

Healthcare

17.9%
-3.5%

Basic Materials

16.9%
-1.3%

Financial Services

14.6%
-23.5%

Industrials

14.6%
-14.1%

Technology

9.5%
-26.1%

Energy

7.6%
-2.5%

Communication Services

7.4%
-3.3%

Utilities

5.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
-4.9%

Real Estate

-

-9.0%

Healthcare

AADR
17.9%
HDGE
-3.5%

Basic Materials

AADR
16.9%
HDGE
-1.3%

Financial Services

AADR
14.6%
HDGE
-23.5%

Industrials

AADR
14.6%
HDGE
-14.1%

Technology

AADR
9.5%
HDGE
-26.1%

Energy

AADR
7.6%
HDGE
-2.5%

Communication Services

AADR
7.4%
HDGE
-3.3%

Utilities

AADR
5.4%
HDGE

-

Consumer Cyclical

AADR
3.9%
HDGE
-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

AADR
2.2%
HDGE
-4.9%

Real Estate

AADR

-

HDGE
-9.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADR vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADR
AADR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADR vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADRHDGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.01

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.05

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

-0.11

+1.51

AADR vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADR and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AADRHDGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

-0.04

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

-0.12

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

-0.63

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.67

+1.11

Drawdowns

AADR vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and HDGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADRHDGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.01%

-93.88%

+48.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-12.26%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.61%

-29.46%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-42.97%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.01%

-83.69%

+38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.54%

-93.08%

+80.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-70.11%

+60.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

6.16%

+0.66%

Volatility

AADR vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) have volatilities of 6.34% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADRHDGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

6.41%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.55%

12.81%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

18.33%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

24.18%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

23.56%

-1.36%

AADR vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADR vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HDGE's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
0.54%0.49%1.33%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.32%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADR and HDGE have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to AADR (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

On 10-year performance, AADR leads with 9.28% vs -14.77% for HDGE. On fees, AADR is cheaper at 1.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AADR has performed better with a 9.28% return vs -14.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AADR is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.54% for AADR.

AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while HDGE is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 3.36% for HDGE.

AADR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADR and HDGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer