PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADBX vs. STMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADBX vs. STMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund (STMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADBX achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than STMGX's 11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, AADBX has underperformed STMGX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while STMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


AADBX

1D
0.58%
1M
2.81%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.64%
1Y
16.59%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
8.81%

STMGX

1D
0.71%
1M
8.63%
YTD
11.65%
6M
10.19%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADBX vs. STMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
5.84%11.65%10.54%12.35%-7.55%16.73%6.30%22.57%-8.11%12.54%
STMGX
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund
11.65%12.98%13.16%25.22%-28.31%12.29%39.82%31.31%1.71%27.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AADBX and STMGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006

0.79

The correlation between AADBX and STMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADBX vs. STMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADBX
AADBX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AADBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AADBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

STMGX
STMGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
STMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
STMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADBX vs. STMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund (STMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADBXSTMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.11

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

7.45

+3.62

AADBX vs. STMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the STMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADBX and STMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AADBXSTMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.41

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.35

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.67

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.46

+0.19

Drawdowns

AADBX vs. STMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADBX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, smaller than the maximum STMGX drawdown of -57.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADBX and STMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADBXSTMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-57.58%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-10.84%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-22.50%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-36.59%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

-36.59%

+8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-10.16%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

3.07%

-1.49%

Volatility

AADBX vs. STMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) is 2.02%, while American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund (STMGX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that AADBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADBXSTMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

4.24%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

12.70%

-6.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.13%

16.27%

-8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.59%

20.83%

-9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

20.89%

-8.46%

AADBX vs. STMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than STMGX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADBX vs. STMGX - Dividend Comparison

AADBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than STMGX's 30.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
8.26%8.77%9.66%2.27%10.60%9.34%13.14%9.00%9.67%7.83%1.87%6.84%
STMGX
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Growth Fund
30.79%34.38%4.86%0.00%3.42%7.49%1.45%3.60%9.39%5.40%6.65%5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADBX and STMGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STMGX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to AADBX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADBX dropped -41.05% vs STMGX's -57.58%.

AADBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADBX and STMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer