PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADBX vs. ADNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund (ADNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADBX achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than ADNPX's 5.77% return.


AADBX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.52%
YTD
4.63%
6M
4.21%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
8.78%

ADNPX

1D
2.20%
1M
5.72%
YTD
5.77%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
-6.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
4.63%11.65%10.54%12.35%-7.55%16.73%6.30%22.57%-8.11%11.91%
ADNPX
American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund
5.77%35.66%8.19%67.46%-66.37%-22.90%147.19%31.93%-3.50%65.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AADBX and ADNPX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.56

The correlation between AADBX and ADNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADBX vs. ADNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADBX
AADBX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AADBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AADBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ADNPX
ADNPX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ADNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ADNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund (ADNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AADBXADNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

0.74

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

1.66

+7.38

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the ADNPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADBX and ADNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADBX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, smaller than the maximum ADNPX drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADBX and ADNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADBXADNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-79.98%

+38.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-30.04%

+24.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-38.99%

+26.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-76.39%

+58.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-45.21%

+43.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-34.76%

+30.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

13.27%

-11.68%

Volatility

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) is 2.78%, while American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund (ADNPX) has a volatility of 12.91%. This indicates that AADBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADBXADNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

12.91%

-10.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

26.88%

-20.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

35.43%

-27.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

45.22%

-33.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

39.69%

-27.26%

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than ADNPX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADBX vs. ADNPX - Dividend Comparison

AADBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, while ADNPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
8.36%8.77%9.66%2.27%10.60%9.34%13.14%9.00%9.67%7.83%1.87%6.84%
ADNPX
American Beacon ARK Transformational Innovation Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.67%31.49%0.39%3.31%6.56%3.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADBX and ADNPX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADNPX has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to AADBX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADBX dropped -41.05% vs ADNPX's -79.98%.

AADBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADBX and ADNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer