PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADBX vs. AGEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y (AGEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADBX achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than AGEYX's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, AADBX has outperformed AGEYX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while AGEYX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


AADBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
4.63%
6M
4.28%
1Y
13.94%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
8.97%

AGEYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.79%
YTD
7.53%
6M
8.14%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
4.63%11.65%10.54%12.35%-7.55%16.73%6.30%22.57%-8.11%12.54%
AGEYX
American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y
7.53%19.15%15.85%13.10%-12.62%6.91%2.54%13.49%-3.42%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AADBX and AGEYX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADBX vs. AGEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADBX
AADBX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AADBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AADBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AGEYX
AGEYX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AGEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
AGEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y (AGEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AADBXAGEYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.51

-1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

6.48

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

29.02

-20.00

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the AGEYX Sharpe Ratio of 5.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADBX and AGEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADBX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, which is greater than AGEYX's maximum drawdown of -22.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADBX and AGEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADBXAGEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-22.24%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-3.15%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-4.77%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-22.24%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

-22.24%

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.13%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-3.53%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.70%

+0.89%

Volatility

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y (AGEYX) at 0.89%. This indicates that AADBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADBXAGEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

0.89%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

3.09%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.35%

3.75%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

5.17%

+6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

4.99%

+7.44%

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than AGEYX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADBX vs. AGEYX - Dividend Comparison

AADBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, less than AGEYX's 9.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
8.36%8.77%9.66%2.27%10.60%9.34%13.14%9.00%9.67%7.83%1.87%6.84%
AGEYX
American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y
9.72%9.99%12.16%9.64%7.50%7.90%7.34%8.61%9.88%7.30%8.43%7.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADBX and AGEYX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AADBX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to AGEYX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADBX dropped -41.05% vs AGEYX's -22.24%.

AGEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.45 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADBX and AGEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer