PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADBX vs. BRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund (BRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADBX achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than BRLGX's 18.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AADBX has underperformed BRLGX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while BRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.46% annualized return.


AADBX

1D
0.58%
1M
2.81%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.64%
1Y
16.59%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
8.81%

BRLGX

1D
0.58%
1M
10.94%
YTD
18.19%
6M
17.42%
1Y
35.15%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
5.84%11.65%10.54%12.35%-7.55%16.73%6.30%22.57%-8.11%12.54%
BRLGX
American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund
18.19%16.31%24.13%31.38%-25.39%22.04%34.57%30.27%-6.18%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AADBX and BRLGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.79

The correlation between AADBX and BRLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADBX vs. BRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADBX
AADBX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AADBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AADBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BRLGX
BRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund (BRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADBXBRLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

2.21

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.92

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.48

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.07

8.43

+2.64

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the BRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADBX and BRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AADBXBRLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.21

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.53

+0.12

Drawdowns

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADBX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, smaller than the maximum BRLGX drawdown of -55.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADBX and BRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADBXBRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-55.32%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-14.64%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-28.25%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-32.58%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

-34.79%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-9.19%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

4.30%

-2.72%

Volatility

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) is 2.02%, while American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund (BRLGX) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that AADBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADBXBRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.83%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

12.67%

-6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.13%

16.41%

-8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.59%

22.57%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

21.89%

-9.46%

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLGX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADBX vs. BRLGX - Dividend Comparison

AADBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than BRLGX's 8.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
8.26%8.77%9.66%2.27%10.60%9.34%13.14%9.00%9.67%7.83%1.87%6.84%
BRLGX
American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund
8.55%10.11%14.74%0.76%17.14%19.83%10.72%10.33%10.87%4.20%0.64%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADBX and BRLGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRLGX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to AADBX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADBX dropped -41.05% vs BRLGX's -55.32%.

BRLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADBX and BRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer