AADBX vs. NISYX
AADBX (American Beacon Balanced Fund) and NISYX (American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - AADBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Beacon, while NISYX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by American Beacon. Over the past 5 years, AADBX returned 6.56%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NISYX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AADBX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for NISYX.
Performance
AADBX vs. NISYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADBX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than NISYX's 0.28% return.
AADBX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
NISYX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
AADBX vs. NISYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADBX American Beacon Balanced Fund | 5.51% | 11.65% | 10.54% | 12.35% | -7.55% | 16.73% | 15.90% |
NISYX American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.28% | 7.34% | 2.91% | 5.88% | -13.42% | -0.01% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADBX and NISYX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.21 |
The correlation between AADBX and NISYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADBX vs. NISYX — Risk / Return Rank
AADBX
NISYX
AADBX vs. NISYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AADBX | NISYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 1.91 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 5.53 | +4.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AADBX | NISYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.40 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.09 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.09 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
AADBX vs. NISYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADBX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, which is greater than NISYX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADBX and NISYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADBX | NISYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.05% | -17.97% | -23.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.50% | -2.84% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -5.81% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.79% | -17.97% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.54% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -6.37% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 0.98% | +0.60% |
Volatility
AADBX vs. NISYX - Volatility Comparison
American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX) at 1.25%. This indicates that AADBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NISYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADBX | NISYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.94% | 1.25% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 2.76% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.13% | 3.89% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.60% | 5.60% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 5.34% | +7.09% |
AADBX vs. NISYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than NISYX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADBX vs. NISYX - Dividend Comparison
AADBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than NISYX's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADBX American Beacon Balanced Fund | 8.29% | 8.77% | 9.66% | 2.27% | 10.60% | 9.34% | 13.14% | 9.00% | 9.67% | 7.83% | 1.87% | 6.84% |
NISYX American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.49% | 4.37% | 4.42% | 3.17% | 2.27% | 2.09% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADBX and NISYX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AADBX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to NISYX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADBX dropped -41.05% vs NISYX's -17.97%.
AADBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADBX and NISYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer