PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADBX vs. NISYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADBX vs. NISYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADBX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than NISYX's 0.28% return.


AADBX

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.95%
YTD
5.51%
6M
6.44%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.77%

NISYX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADBX vs. NISYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
5.51%11.65%10.54%12.35%-7.55%16.73%15.90%
NISYX
American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund
0.28%7.34%2.91%5.88%-13.42%-0.01%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AADBX and NISYX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.21

The correlation between AADBX and NISYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADBX vs. NISYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADBX
AADBX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AADBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AADBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NISYX
NISYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NISYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NISYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NISYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NISYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NISYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADBX vs. NISYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) and American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADBXNISYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.91

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

5.53

+4.79

AADBX vs. NISYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the NISYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADBX and NISYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AADBXNISYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.40

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.09

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.09

+0.55

Drawdowns

AADBX vs. NISYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADBX drawdown since its inception was -41.05%, which is greater than NISYX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADBX and NISYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADBXNISYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-17.97%

-23.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-2.84%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-5.81%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-17.97%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.54%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-6.37%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.98%

+0.60%

Volatility

AADBX vs. NISYX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon Balanced Fund (AADBX) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund (NISYX) at 1.25%. This indicates that AADBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NISYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADBXNISYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

1.25%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

2.76%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.13%

3.89%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

5.60%

+6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

5.34%

+7.09%

AADBX vs. NISYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than NISYX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADBX vs. NISYX - Dividend Comparison

AADBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than NISYX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADBX
American Beacon Balanced Fund
8.29%8.77%9.66%2.27%10.60%9.34%13.14%9.00%9.67%7.83%1.87%6.84%
NISYX
American Beacon NIS Core Plus Bond Fund
4.49%4.37%4.42%3.17%2.27%2.09%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADBX and NISYX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AADBX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to NISYX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADBX dropped -41.05% vs NISYX's -17.97%.

AADBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADBX and NISYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer