AABFX vs. TMSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX).
AABFX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 28, 1997. TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | -2.16% | 12.23% | 10.08% | 12.04% | -13.93% | 11.83% | 8.69% | 16.65% | -5.09% | 10.06% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than TMSIX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AABFX has underperformed TMSIX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while TMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.
AABFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.39%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AABFX vs. TMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
AABFX
TMSIX
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AABFX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.34 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 0.62 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 0.34 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 1.38 | +5.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AABFX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.34 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.25 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.55 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between AABFX and TMSIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Dividend Comparison
AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, less than TMSIX's 12.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | 6.76% | 7.25% | 6.43% | 2.97% | 2.26% | 6.99% | 2.03% | 2.37% | 9.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 1.90% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
Drawdowns
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, smaller than the maximum TMSIX drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and TMSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AABFX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.44% | -56.10% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.52% | -13.29% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.56% | -31.57% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.40% | -40.66% | +13.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -8.97% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -10.06% | +4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 3.29% | -1.95% |
Volatility
AABFX vs. TMSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) is 2.75%, while Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that AABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AABFX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 5.48% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 10.71% | -6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 19.02% | -11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 20.37% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 20.40% | -11.12% |