AAAGX vs. TMSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX).
AAAGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999. TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | -10.59% | 16.12% | 39.55% | 46.09% | -34.10% | 22.05% | 42.49% | 31.64% | 1.43% | 24.42% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 0.36% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a -10.59% return, which is significantly lower than TMSIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has outperformed TMSIX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while TMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.47% annualized return.
AAAGX
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -9.72%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
TMSIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAAGX vs. TMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
AAAGX
TMSIX
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAAGX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.48 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 0.81 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.11 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.72 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 2.87 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAAGX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.48 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.26 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.56 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.44 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAGX and TMSIX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Dividend Comparison
AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than TMSIX's 12.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | 4.21% | 3.77% | 14.46% | 3.55% | 9.38% | 6.93% | 7.74% | 5.39% | 12.26% | 0.00% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.35% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
Drawdowns
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than TMSIX's maximum drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and TMSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAGX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.98% | -56.10% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -13.29% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.41% | -31.57% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.41% | -40.66% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -6.41% | -7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -10.06% | -13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 3.31% | +1.59% |
Volatility
AAAGX vs. TMSIX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) at 6.28%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAAGX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 6.28% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 11.07% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.01% | 19.18% | +3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 20.41% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 20.42% | +1.23% |