PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AAAGX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AAAGX and FSPGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.62%
22.25%
AAAGX
FSPGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AAAGX:

1.07

FSPGX:

1.72

Sortino Ratio

AAAGX:

1.45

FSPGX:

2.28

Omega Ratio

AAAGX:

1.21

FSPGX:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

AAAGX:

1.05

FSPGX:

2.35

Martin Ratio

AAAGX:

4.66

FSPGX:

8.84

Ulcer Index

AAAGX:

4.18%

FSPGX:

3.49%

Daily Std Dev

AAAGX:

18.11%

FSPGX:

17.87%

Max Drawdown

AAAGX:

-72.83%

FSPGX:

-32.66%

Current Drawdown

AAAGX:

-7.73%

FSPGX:

-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 2.12% return.


AAAGX

YTD

2.76%

1M

1.14%

6M

11.62%

1Y

17.10%

5Y*

8.36%

10Y*

8.51%

FSPGX

YTD

2.12%

1M

0.65%

6M

22.25%

1Y

28.35%

5Y*

18.01%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


AAAGX
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for AAAGX: current value at 1.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.03%
Expense ratio chart for FSPGX: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AAAGX vs. FSPGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAAGX is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAAGX is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAAGX is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAAGX is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAAGX is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAAGX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSPGX is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AAAGX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.071.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for AAAGX, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.452.28
The chart of Omega ratio for AAAGX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.211.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for AAAGX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.052.35
The chart of Martin ratio for AAAGX, currently valued at 4.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.668.84
AAAGX
FSPGX

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.07
1.72
AAAGX
FSPGX

Dividends

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

AAAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
AAAGX
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.36%0.37%0.73%0.86%0.54%0.74%0.99%1.14%0.99%0.30%

Drawdowns

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -72.83%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and FSPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.73%
-2.01%
AAAGX
FSPGX

Volatility

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) is 5.49%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that AAAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.49%
6.28%
AAAGX
FSPGX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab