AAAGX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AAAGX (Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AAAGX returned 13.73%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for FSPGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AAAGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 9.01% return.

AAAGX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 5.82%
• 1Y: 24.44%
• 3Y*: 26.42%
• 5Y*: 13.73%
• 10Y*: 17.26%

FSPGX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: 25.69%
• 5Y*: 15.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	6.45%	16.12%	39.55%	46.09%	-34.10%	22.05%	42.49%	31.64%	1.43%	22.93%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	9.01%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAGX and FSPGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.97

The correlation between AAAGX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AAAGX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAGX

AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAAGX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.93	-0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.60	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	1.83	-0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.98	6.14	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAGX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.93	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.75	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.90	-0.56

Drawdowns

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAGX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.98%	-32.66%	-32.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-16.17%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.44%	-23.32%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.41%	-32.66%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-6.38%	-17.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	4.81%	+0.20%

Volatility

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.26%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAGX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	3.26%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.19%	11.58%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	15.41%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.74%	21.49%	+1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	21.55%	+0.16%

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAGX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.54%	3.77%	14.46%	3.55%	9.38%	6.93%	7.74%	5.39%	12.26%	0.00%	0.60%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAGX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, AAAGX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AAAGX or FSPGX?

AAAGX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FSPGX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAGX dropped -64.98% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.