AAAGX vs. FSPGX

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 21.90% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 33.80% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AAAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -72.83%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and FSPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 4.93%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.