AAAGX vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
AAAGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAAGX or SCHX.
Correlation
The correlation between AAAGX and SCHX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AAAGX:
1.25
SCHX:
2.23
AAAGX:
1.64
SCHX:
2.96
AAAGX:
1.25
SCHX:
1.41
AAAGX:
0.90
SCHX:
3.31
AAAGX:
7.31
SCHX:
14.50
AAAGX:
3.04%
SCHX:
1.95%
AAAGX:
17.81%
SCHX:
12.67%
AAAGX:
-72.83%
SCHX:
-34.33%
AAAGX:
-9.86%
SCHX:
-3.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 21.90% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
AAAGX
21.90%
-5.36%
2.36%
23.81%
9.53%
8.29%
SCHX
26.31%
-0.12%
9.96%
28.27%
16.47%
15.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
AAAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.80% | 4.18% | 3.24% | 1.25% | 2.45% | 3.86% | 6.50% | 2.65% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.70% | 3.18% |
Drawdowns
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -72.83%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and SCHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 3.86%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.