AAAGX vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
AAAGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAAGX or SCHX.
Correlation
The correlation between AAAGX and SCHX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AAAGX:
0.15
SCHX:
1.02
AAAGX:
0.32
SCHX:
1.42
AAAGX:
1.04
SCHX:
1.19
AAAGX:
0.15
SCHX:
1.61
AAAGX:
0.56
SCHX:
6.06
AAAGX:
5.09%
SCHX:
2.27%
AAAGX:
18.45%
SCHX:
13.39%
AAAGX:
-72.83%
SCHX:
-34.33%
AAAGX:
-15.30%
SCHX:
-6.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's -2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 7.16%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.
AAAGX
-5.68%
-8.21%
-2.62%
3.89%
8.65%
7.16%
SCHX
-2.42%
-5.28%
5.16%
14.28%
17.57%
15.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAAGX vs. SCHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AAAGX
SCHX
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
AAAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 2.49% | 2.38% | 2.75% | 2.47% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 4.65% | 4.35% | 3.29% | 3.26% | 5.11% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -72.83%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and SCHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAAGX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 5.26%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.