AAAGX vs. AABFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX).
AAAGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999. AABFX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 28, 1997.
Performance
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | -10.59% | 16.12% | 39.55% | 46.09% | -34.10% | 22.05% | 42.49% | 31.64% | 1.43% | 24.42% |
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | -1.39% | 12.23% | 10.08% | 12.04% | -13.93% | 11.83% | 8.69% | 16.65% | -5.09% | 10.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a -10.59% return, which is significantly lower than AABFX's -1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has outperformed AABFX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while AABFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.26% annualized return.
AAAGX
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -9.72%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
AABFX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 10.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than AABFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAAGX vs. AABFX — Risk / Return Rank
AAAGX
AABFX
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAAGX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.34 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.90 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.90 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 7.71 | -4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAAGX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.34 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.57 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.40 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAGX and AABFX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Dividend Comparison
AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than AABFX's 6.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | 4.21% | 3.77% | 14.46% | 3.55% | 9.38% | 6.93% | 7.74% | 5.39% | 12.26% | 0.00% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | 6.70% | 7.25% | 6.43% | 2.97% | 2.26% | 6.99% | 2.03% | 2.37% | 9.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 1.90% |
Drawdowns
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than AABFX's maximum drawdown of -43.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and AABFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAGX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.98% | -43.44% | -21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -5.52% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.41% | -21.56% | -18.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.41% | -27.40% | -13.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -4.32% | -9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -5.67% | -18.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 1.36% | +3.54% |
Volatility
AAAGX vs. AABFX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) at 2.92%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAAGX | AABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 2.92% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 4.69% | +8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.01% | 7.66% | +15.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 8.48% | +14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 9.28% | +12.37% |