AAAC vs. PCMM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) and PCMM (BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AAAC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PCMM.

Performance

AAAC vs. PCMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAC achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than PCMM's 1.97% return.

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 2.48%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCMM

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 1.76%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. PCMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.69%	0.15%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	1.97%	0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and PCMM is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

AAAC vs. PCMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCMM

PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 51
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAC vs. PCMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAC	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.16	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.69	—

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. PCMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum PCMM drawdown of -4.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and PCMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAC	PCMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-4.32%	+3.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.67%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-0.42%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAC	PCMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85%	3.36%	-2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.85%	4.85%	-4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.85%	4.85%	-4.00%

AAAC vs. PCMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PCMM's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAC vs. PCMM - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than PCMM's 6.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.65%	0.03%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	6.50%	7.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAC and PCMM in my portfolio?

AAAC and PCMM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAAC or PCMM?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAC or PCMM?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for PCMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAC or PCMM?

PCMM has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 2.65% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between AAAC and PCMM?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.68% for PCMM.