PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCMM vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PCMM vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PCMM vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PCMM
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF
-0.92%6.30%0.50%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
-1.27%6.88%0.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCMM achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -1.27% return.


PCMM

1D
-0.63%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.37%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKLN

1D
0.49%
1M
1.56%
YTD
-1.27%
6M
0.69%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
7.57%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PCMM vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCMM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PCMM vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCMM
PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCMM vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCMMBKLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

1.33

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

2.08

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.37

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.83

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

6.90

-2.64

PCMM vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCMM and BKLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCMMBKLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.33

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.63

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PCMM and BKLN is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PCMM vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

PCMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than BKLN's 7.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCMM
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF
6.83%7.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
7.05%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%

Drawdowns

PCMM vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCMM drawdown since its inception was -4.32%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMM and BKLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PCMMBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-24.17%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-3.07%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-1.56%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-1.10%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.81%

-0.09%

Volatility

PCMM vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) is 1.48%, while Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that PCMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PCMMBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.75%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

2.43%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

4.27%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.11%

4.46%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

6.44%

-1.33%