AAAC vs. HSRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) and HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. AAAC is actively managed, while HSRT is passively managed. AAAC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HSRT.

Performance

AAAC vs. HSRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HSRT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. HSRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

AAAC vs. HSRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAC	HSRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.56	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAC	HSRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAC	HSRT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.89%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.89%	—	—

AAAC vs. HSRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HSRT's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AAAC vs. HSRT - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	1.29%	6.37%	3.98%	2.67%	2.23%	2.88%	3.50%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AAAC or HSRT?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAC or HSRT?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HSRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAC or HSRT?

AAAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.

What is the main difference between AAAC and HSRT?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.24% for HSRT.