9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE
9W1.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) are both China Equities funds - 9W1.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped while CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 9W1.DE returned 4.84%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for CEBG.DE. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 9W1.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEBG.DE.
Performance
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than CEBG.DE's 11.81% return.
9W1.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 16.61%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -6.89% | 16.44% | 21.98% | -17.19% | -22.95% | 1.33% |
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 9.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1.DE and CEBG.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1.DE
CEBG.DE
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9W1.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.29 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.78 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 11.03 | -10.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9W1.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 1.63 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.24 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.36%, smaller than the maximum CEBG.DE drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1.DE and CEBG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.36% | -53.49% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -11.78% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | -30.41% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.23% | -4.44% | -20.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -15.04% | -12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 2.98% | +5.39% |
Volatility
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) is 7.19%, while VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that 9W1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 7.80% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 16.73% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 20.05% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 21.13% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 24.18% | +4.51% |
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 9W1.DE nor CEBG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
9W1.DE and CEBG.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
9W1.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1.DE and 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1.DE and CEBG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer