9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE
9W1.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and ASRF.DE (BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 9W1.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while ASRF.DE is a European High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro High Yield SRI Sustainable Ex Fossil Fuel. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 9W1.DE returned 4.84%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for ASRF.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 9W1.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ASRF.DE.
Performance
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than ASRF.DE's 0.70% return.
9W1.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -9.48%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASRF.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- —
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -6.89% | 16.44% | 21.98% | -17.19% | -22.95% | 1.33% |
ASRF.DE BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc | 0.70% | 4.66% | 6.57% | 11.42% | -11.08% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1.DE and ASRF.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.24 |
The correlation between 9W1.DE and ASRF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1.DE
ASRF.DE
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9W1.DE | ASRF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.18 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.09 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 4.34 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9W1.DE | ASRF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 0.93 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.45 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.36%, which is greater than ASRF.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1.DE and ASRF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1.DE | ASRF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.36% | -16.76% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -3.25% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | -3.86% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.23% | -0.34% | -24.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -4.24% | -23.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 0.82% | +7.55% |
Volatility
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE) at 1.05%. This indicates that 9W1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1.DE | ASRF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 1.05% | +6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 3.20% | +10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 3.80% | +15.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 5.85% | +22.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 5.83% | +22.86% |
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRF.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 9W1.DE nor ASRF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
9W1.DE and ASRF.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASRF.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRF.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1.DE.
9W1.DE is categorized as China Equities, while ASRF.DE is European High Yield Bonds. 9W1.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while ASRF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro High Yield SRI Sustainable Ex Fossil Fuel. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1.DE and 0.25% for ASRF.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1.DE and ASRF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer