500G.L vs. BYBU.L
500G.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and BYBU.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds from Amundi - 500G.L tracks the S&P 500 while BYBU.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 500G.L returned 15.05%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for BYBU.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
500G.L is traded in GBp, while BYBU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BYBU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 500G.L achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than BYBU.L's 8.62% return.
500G.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
BYBU.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.57% | 9.44% | 27.44% | 19.89% | -8.86% | 31.35% | 13.81% | 27.01% | 0.05% | 5.99% |
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.62% | 9.02% | 16.67% | 10.84% | -3.19% | 37.48% | 2.26% | 25.34% | -0.50% | 4.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500G.L and BYBU.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2017 | 0.35 |
The correlation between 500G.L and BYBU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500G.L vs. BYBU.L — Risk / Return Rank
500G.L
BYBU.L
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500G.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 4.69 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.27 | 13.40 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500G.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 1.97 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.98 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, which is greater than BYBU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500G.L and BYBU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500G.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.52% | -23.51% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -5.06% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -20.81% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -20.81% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -4.19% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.78% | +0.13% |
Volatility
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) is 2.65%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that 500G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500G.L | BYBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.26% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 8.60% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 12.07% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 20.07% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 25.20% | -9.66% |
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 500G.L and BYBU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
500G.L vs. BYBU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500G.L nor BYBU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
500G.L and BYBU.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500G.L and BYBU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
500G.L tracks S&P 500, while BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR.
Find the right allocation for 500G.L and BYBU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer