500G.L vs. QQMG
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD (500G.L) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG).
500G.L and QQMG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 500G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. QQMG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2021. Both 500G.L and QQMG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 500G.L or QQMG.
Key characteristics
| 500G.L | QQMG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.58% | 23.77% |
| 1Y Return | 33.08% | 45.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.72% | 11.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.96 | 2.59 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.09 | 3.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.00 | 3.34 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.35 | 11.68 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.58% | 4.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.84% | 18.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.52% | -35.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.41% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500G.L and QQMG is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
500G.L vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 500G.L achieves a 20.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQMG's 23.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
500G.L vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
500G.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
500G.L vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD (500G.L) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
500G.L vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison
500G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% |
Drawdowns
500G.L vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, smaller than the maximum QQMG drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500G.L and QQMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
500G.L vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD (500G.L) is 1.83%, while Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that 500G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.