PortfoliosLab logo
500G.L vs. 500D.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between 500G.L and 500D.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

500G.L vs. 500D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD (500G.L) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (D) (500D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

500G.L:

0.43

500D.L:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

500G.L:

0.76

500D.L:

1.20

Omega Ratio

500G.L:

1.11

500D.L:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

500G.L:

0.38

500D.L:

0.77

Martin Ratio

500G.L:

1.16

500D.L:

3.06

Ulcer Index

500G.L:

6.93%

500D.L:

4.76%

Daily Std Dev

500G.L:

16.96%

500D.L:

17.69%

Max Drawdown

500G.L:

-25.52%

500D.L:

-24.21%

Current Drawdown

500G.L:

-11.24%

500D.L:

-3.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 500G.L achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than 500D.L's -0.05% return.


500G.L

YTD

-7.13%

1M

5.97%

6M

-7.42%

1Y

7.38%

3Y*

11.64%

5Y*

13.93%

10Y*

N/A

500D.L

YTD

-0.05%

1M

7.30%

6M

-1.64%

1Y

13.68%

3Y*

14.23%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD

Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (D)

500G.L vs. 500D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500G.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than 500D.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

500G.L vs. 500D.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500G.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 500G.L is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 500G.L is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 500G.L is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 500G.L is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 500G.L is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 500G.L is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

500D.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 500D.L is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 500D.L is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 500D.L is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 500D.L is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 500D.L is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 500D.L is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

500G.L vs. 500D.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD (500G.L) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (D) (500D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 500G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the 500D.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500G.L and 500D.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

500G.L vs. 500D.L - Dividend Comparison

500G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 500D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.


TTM202420232022
500G.L
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
500D.L
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (D)
1.17%1.17%0.93%1.44%

Drawdowns

500G.L vs. 500D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, which is greater than 500D.L's maximum drawdown of -24.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500G.L and 500D.L.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

500G.L vs. 500D.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF C USD (500G.L) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (D) (500D.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that 500G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...