3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L
3GOE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs) and 5QQE.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - 3GOE.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while 5QQE.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3GOE.L is passively managed, while 5QQE.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3GOE.L returned 88.32%/yr vs 57.26%/yr for 5QQE.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3GOE.L is traded in USD, while 5QQE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 5QQE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3GOE.L achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly lower than 5QQE.L's 46.06% return.
3GOE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -24.44%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 475.90%
- 3Y*
- 88.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.06%
- 10Y*
- —
5QQE.L
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- -19.03%
- YTD
- 46.06%
- 6M
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 113.92%
- 3Y*
- 57.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3GOE.L Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs | 18.14% | 133.65% | 89.16% | 159.88% | -86.56% | -1.67% |
5QQE.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR | 46.06% | 2.35% | 73.70% | 426.90% | -96.07% | 17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3GOE.L and 5QQE.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between 3GOE.L and 5QQE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L — Risk / Return Rank
3GOE.L
5QQE.L
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3GOE.L | 5QQE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.25 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.30 | 2.00 | +7.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.48 | 5.41 | +22.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3GOE.L drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, smaller than the maximum 5QQE.L drawdown of -96.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOE.L and 5QQE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3GOE.L | 5QQE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.62% | -96.30% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.18% | -56.52% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.84% | -80.24% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.57% | -46.66% | +13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.18% | -73.68% | +30.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.32% | 20.96% | -3.64% |
Volatility
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a higher volatility of 36.39% compared to Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) at 33.84%. This indicates that 3GOE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5QQE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3GOE.L | 5QQE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.39% | 33.84% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.31% | 65.21% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.41% | 83.32% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.63% | 108.19% | -17.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.06% | 108.19% | -19.13% |
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3GOE.L and 5QQE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3GOE.L vs. 5QQE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3GOE.L nor 5QQE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3GOE.L and 5QQE.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3GOE.L and 5QQE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3GOE.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while 5QQE.L is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for 3GOE.L and 5QQE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer