PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5QQE.L is traded in EUR, while KWE3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KWE3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQE.L achieves a 94.22% return, which is significantly higher than KWE3.L's -57.39% return.


5QQE.L

1D
-3.82%
1M
45.57%
YTD
94.22%
6M
81.64%
1Y
205.09%
3Y*
69.77%
5Y*
10Y*

KWE3.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-17.47%
YTD
-57.39%
6M
-62.45%
1Y
-60.12%
3Y*
-36.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
5QQE.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR
94.22%-9.64%85.35%410.76%-95.87%10.41%
KWE3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities
-57.39%-1.73%-17.80%-63.03%-87.03%-17.89%

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQE.L and KWE3.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.35

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
5QQE.L
KWE3.L

Technology

54.2%
3.6%

Communication Services

15.5%
40.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
6.9%

Industrials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
4.8%

Technology

5QQE.L
54.2%
KWE3.L
3.6%

Communication Services

5QQE.L
15.5%
KWE3.L
40.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5QQE.L
12.2%
KWE3.L
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

5QQE.L
7.6%
KWE3.L
4.3%

Healthcare

5QQE.L
4.2%
KWE3.L
6.9%

Industrials

5QQE.L
2.8%
KWE3.L

-

Utilities

5QQE.L
1.4%
KWE3.L

-

Basic Materials

5QQE.L
1.2%
KWE3.L

-

Energy

5QQE.L
0.6%
KWE3.L

-

Financial Services

5QQE.L
0.2%
KWE3.L
2.0%

Real Estate

5QQE.L
0.1%
KWE3.L
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQE.L
5QQE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

KWE3.L
KWE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5QQE.LKWE3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.89

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

-0.76

+4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

-1.35

+11.21

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQE.L and KWE3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5QQE.LKWE3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

-0.75

+3.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.46

+0.42

Drawdowns

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQE.L drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, roughly equal to the maximum KWE3.L drawdown of -98.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQE.L and KWE3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5QQE.LKWE3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.05%

-98.76%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.03%

-78.98%

+22.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.97%

-84.00%

+3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.31%

-98.67%

+67.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.99%

-90.05%

+15.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.72%

44.46%

-23.74%

Volatility

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) is 24.60%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) has a volatility of 35.79%. This indicates that 5QQE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWE3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5QQE.LKWE3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.60%

35.79%

-11.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.93%

60.50%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.27%

80.13%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

108.77%

134.54%

-25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.77%

134.54%

-25.77%

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5QQE.L and KWE3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5QQE.L nor KWE3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5QQE.L and KWE3.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5QQE.L and KWE3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

5QQE.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KWE3.L is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5QQE.L and KWE3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer