5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L
5QQE.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR) and KWE3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - 5QQE.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while KWE3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5QQE.L returned 69.77%/yr vs -36.12%/yr for KWE3.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
5QQE.L is traded in EUR, while KWE3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KWE3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5QQE.L achieves a 94.22% return, which is significantly higher than KWE3.L's -57.39% return.
5QQE.L
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- 45.57%
- YTD
- 94.22%
- 6M
- 81.64%
- 1Y
- 205.09%
- 3Y*
- 69.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWE3.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -17.47%
- YTD
- -57.39%
- 6M
- -62.45%
- 1Y
- -60.12%
- 3Y*
- -36.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5QQE.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR | 94.22% | -9.64% | 85.35% | 410.76% | -95.87% | 10.41% |
KWE3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities | -57.39% | -1.73% | -17.80% | -63.03% | -87.03% | -17.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5QQE.L and KWE3.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.35 |
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Communication Services
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Consumer Cyclical
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Consumer Defensive
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Healthcare
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Industrials
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
-
Utilities
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
-
Basic Materials
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
-
Energy
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
-
Financial Services
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Real Estate
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L — Risk / Return Rank
5QQE.L
KWE3.L
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 5QQE.L | KWE3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.89 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | -0.76 | +4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | -1.35 | +11.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 5QQE.L | KWE3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | -0.75 | +3.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.46 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5QQE.L drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, roughly equal to the maximum KWE3.L drawdown of -98.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQE.L and KWE3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5QQE.L | KWE3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.05% | -98.76% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.03% | -78.98% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.97% | -84.00% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.31% | -98.67% | +67.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.99% | -90.05% | +15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.72% | 44.46% | -23.74% |
Volatility
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) is 24.60%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) has a volatility of 35.79%. This indicates that 5QQE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWE3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5QQE.L | KWE3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.60% | 35.79% | -11.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.93% | 60.50% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.27% | 80.13% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.77% | 134.54% | -25.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.77% | 134.54% | -25.77% |
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 5QQE.L and KWE3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
5QQE.L vs. KWE3.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 5QQE.L nor KWE3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
5QQE.L and KWE3.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
5QQE.L and KWE3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
5QQE.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KWE3.L is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for 5QQE.L and KWE3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer