PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
-22.79%133.65%0.27%
NVDI.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP
-12.15%16.65%-7.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOE.L achieves a -22.79% return, which is significantly lower than NVDI.L's -12.15% return.


3GOE.L

1D
13.98%
1M
-11.42%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
52.60%
1Y
283.69%
3Y*
87.03%
5Y*
23.58%
10Y*

NVDI.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-12.15%
6M
-13.46%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GOE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDI.L
NVDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NVDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOE.LNVDI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

0.50

+2.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

0.88

+2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.12

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

0.76

+4.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.04

1.87

+17.17

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the NVDI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOE.L and NVDI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOE.LNVDI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

0.50

+2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.07

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOE.L and NVDI.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Dividend Comparison

3GOE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.38%.


TTM20252024
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDI.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP
20.38%32.04%2.59%

Drawdowns

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOE.L drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, which is greater than NVDI.L's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOE.L and NVDI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOE.LNVDI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.62%

-31.39%

-57.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.18%

-21.59%

-29.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.10%

-20.26%

-19.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.28%

-10.15%

-34.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.31%

8.80%

+6.51%

Volatility

3GOE.L vs. NVDI.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a higher volatility of 24.37% compared to IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) at 6.85%. This indicates that 3GOE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3GOE.LNVDI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.37%

6.85%

+17.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.64%

23.80%

+36.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.37%

35.79%

+55.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.60%

40.10%

+49.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.21%

40.10%

+49.11%