PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
5QQE.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR
-33.48%-9.64%85.35%410.76%-73.94%
3SPY.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities
-14.08%-0.95%74.55%53.49%-41.55%
Different Trading Currencies

5QQE.L is traded in EUR, while 3SPY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3SPY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQE.L achieves a -33.48% return, which is significantly lower than 3SPY.L's -14.08% return.


5QQE.L

1D
15.37%
1M
-19.06%
YTD
-33.48%
6M
-34.27%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
40.01%
5Y*
10Y*

3SPY.L

1D
5.54%
1M
-11.26%
YTD
-14.08%
6M
-10.45%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
26.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5QQE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3SPY.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQE.L
5QQE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

3SPY.L
3SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5QQE.L3SPY.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.19

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

0.81

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.31

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.99

0.67

+0.32

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is comparable to the 3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQE.L and 3SPY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5QQE.L3SPY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.19

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.15

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQE.L and 3SPY.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5QQE.L nor 3SPY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQE.L drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, which is greater than 3SPY.L's maximum drawdown of -58.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQE.L and 3SPY.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


5QQE.L3SPY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.05%

-56.70%

-39.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.03%

-41.60%

-14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.47%

-36.78%

-39.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.94%

-20.38%

-55.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.20%

18.78%

+1.42%

Volatility

5QQE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) has a higher volatility of 28.19% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) at 12.81%. This indicates that 5QQE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3SPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


5QQE.L3SPY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.19%

12.81%

+15.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.38%

48.36%

+10.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.28%

70.89%

+25.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.33%

52.26%

+57.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.33%

52.26%

+57.07%