PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
-22.79%133.65%89.16%159.88%-86.56%53.83%
3PLT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities
-58.81%173.40%2,483.77%388.04%-99.48%-71.38%
Different Trading Currencies

3GOE.L is traded in USD, while 3PLT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3PLT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOE.L achieves a -22.79% return, which is significantly higher than 3PLT.L's -58.81% return.


3GOE.L

1D
13.98%
1M
-11.42%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
52.60%
1Y
283.69%
3Y*
87.03%
5Y*
23.58%
10Y*

3PLT.L

1D
9.28%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-58.81%
6M
-70.17%
1Y
57.03%
3Y*
348.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOE.L and 3PLT.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

3PLT.L
3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOE.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

0.35

+2.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

1.65

+1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

0.56

+5.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.04

1.13

+17.91

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOE.L and 3PLT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOE.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

0.35

+2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.14

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOE.L and 3PLT.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOE.L nor 3PLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOE.L drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, smaller than the maximum 3PLT.L drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOE.L and 3PLT.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOE.L3PLT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.62%

-99.89%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.18%

-83.56%

+32.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.10%

-83.63%

+43.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.28%

-84.57%

+40.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.31%

41.68%

-26.37%

Volatility

3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) is 24.37%, while Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a volatility of 34.55%. This indicates that 3GOE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3PLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3GOE.L3PLT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.37%

34.55%

-10.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.64%

109.71%

-49.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.37%

161.93%

-70.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.60%

195.33%

-105.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.21%

195.33%

-106.12%