36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE
36BD.DE (iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - 36BD.DE tracks the FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped while CEMF.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. 36BD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CEMF.DE.
Performance
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BD.DE achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -1.42% return.
36BD.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
36BD.DE iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.33% | 0.60% |
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.42% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between 36BD.DE and CEMF.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36BD.DE
CEMF.DE
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc (36BD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 36BD.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 36BD.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.29 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BD.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BD.DE and CEMF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36BD.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -4.45% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -2.97% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -1.20% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | — | — |
Volatility
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 36BD.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 4.62% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.21% | 4.62% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.16% | 4.62% | +2.54% |
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36BD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
36BD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 36BD.DE nor CEMF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
36BD.DE and CEMF.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 36BD.DE.
36BD.DE tracks FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped, while CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 36BD.DE and 0.10% for CEMF.DE.
Find the right allocation for 36BD.DE and CEMF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer