36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE
36BD.DE (iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc) and TRDL.DE (Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist) are both Government Bonds funds - 36BD.DE tracks the FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped while TRDL.DE tracks the Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 36BD.DE returned 1.18%/yr vs -4.02%/yr for TRDL.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 36BD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TRDL.DE.
Performance
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BD.DE achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than TRDL.DE's 0.56% return.
36BD.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- —
TRDL.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 1.59%
- 3Y*
- -4.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BD.DE iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.33% | -5.15% | 8.61% | 0.84% | -6.37% |
TRDL.DE Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist | 0.56% | -6.69% | -1.18% | -1.92% | -4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between 36BD.DE and TRDL.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2022 | 0.52 |
The correlation between 36BD.DE and TRDL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36BD.DE
TRDL.DE
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc (36BD.DE) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRDL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 36BD.DE | TRDL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 0.51 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 36BD.DE | TRDL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.28 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BD.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, smaller than the maximum TRDL.DE drawdown of -21.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BD.DE and TRDL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36BD.DE | TRDL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -21.20% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | -6.76% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.13% | -16.89% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -16.50% | +10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -11.77% | +6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 3.09% | -1.54% |
Volatility
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc (36BD.DE) is 0.74%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRDL.DE) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that 36BD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRDL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 36BD.DE | TRDL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 2.50% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | 6.26% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 9.00% | -3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.21% | 13.14% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.16% | 13.14% | -5.98% |
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36BD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TRDL.DE's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
36BD.DE vs. TRDL.DE - Dividend Comparison
36BD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRDL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BD.DE iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRDL.DE Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist | 4.15% | 4.26% | 4.36% | 2.87% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
36BD.DE and TRDL.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRDL.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRDL.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 36BD.DE.
36BD.DE tracks FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped, while TRDL.DE tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 36BD.DE and 0.06% for TRDL.DE.
Find the right allocation for 36BD.DE and TRDL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer