CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE
CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) and XUTD.DE (Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D) are both Government Bonds funds - CEMF.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index while XUTD.DE tracks the iBoxx USD Treasuries Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMF.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XUTD.DE.
Performance
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than XUTD.DE's 1.08% return.
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUTD.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.42% | 2.59% |
XUTD.DE Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D | 1.08% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMF.DE and XUTD.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMF.DE
XUTD.DE
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMF.DE | XUTD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.05 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, smaller than the maximum XUTD.DE drawdown of -18.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and XUTD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMF.DE | XUTD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -18.01% | +13.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -13.39% | +10.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -9.35% | +8.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMF.DE | XUTD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62% | 5.56% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 8.15% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 7.94% | -3.32% |
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XUTD.DE's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMF.DE vs. XUTD.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUTD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUTD.DE Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D | 3.47% | 3.43% | 3.53% | 2.45% | 1.97% | 3.26% | 1.18% | 1.46% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMF.DE and XUTD.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUTD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUTD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CEMF.DE.
CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index, while XUTD.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CEMF.DE and 0.06% for XUTD.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMF.DE and XUTD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer