36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc (36BD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE).
36BD.DE and MDBA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 36BD.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped. It was launched on Dec 6, 2019. MDBA.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. Both 36BD.DE and MDBA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BD.DE iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.49% | -5.15% | 8.61% | 0.84% | -1.81% | 3.54% |
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.36% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 3.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BD.DE achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than MDBA.DE's 1.36% return.
36BD.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- -3.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 36BD.DE and MDBA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36BD.DE
MDBA.DE
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc (36BD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 36BD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | -0.47 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | -0.59 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.39 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | -0.65 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 36BD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | -0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.25 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between 36BD.DE and MDBA.DE is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 36BD.DE nor MDBA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BD.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, roughly equal to the maximum MDBA.DE drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BD.DE and MDBA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36BD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -12.17% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -6.91% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -5.99% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -5.54% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 4.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility
36BD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF USD Acc (36BD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) have volatilities of 1.77% and 1.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 36BD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 1.84% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 3.80% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.87% | 6.76% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 7.29% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 7.09% | +0.15% |