PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than SPP7.DE's 1.36% return.


CEMF.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPP7.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.48%
1Y
-2.41%
3Y*
0.46%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPP7.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMF.DE

SPP7.DE
SPP7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SPP7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPP7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPP7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMF.DESPP7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.06

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between CEMF.DE and SPP7.DE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPP7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPP7.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.03%4.20%3.47%4.07%1.66%0.97%1.69%2.33%1.98%1.99%0.70%

Drawdowns

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.14%, smaller than the maximum SPP7.DE drawdown of -20.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and SPP7.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMF.DESPP7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-20.31%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-14.35%

+11.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-10.54%

+9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

Volatility

CEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CEMF.DESPP7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

8.05%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

9.17%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

8.51%

-4.09%