2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2B7C.DE (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and 3190.HK (Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B7C.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while 3190.HK is a Dividend fund tracking the Hang Seng Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong (Selected Corporations) High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 2B7C.DE returned 18.60%/yr vs 22.68%/yr for 3190.HK. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2B7C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for 3190.HK.

Performance

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2B7C.DE is traded in EUR, while 3190.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3190.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than 3190.HK's 8.54% return.

2B7C.DE

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 13.30%
• 6M: 14.11%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 13.22%
• 10Y*: —

3190.HK

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -3.04%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 26.97%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF	13.30%	6.91%	23.72%	13.89%	7.00%
3190.HK Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF	8.50%	23.14%	44.38%	8.80%	-5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and 3190.HK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022	0.12

Return for Risk

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7C.DE

2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

3190.HK

3190.HK Risk / Return Rank: 66
3190.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
3190.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
3190.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 60
3190.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
3190.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2B7C.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.77	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.45	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.36	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	8.82	-1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the 3190.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7C.DE and 3190.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2B7C.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.77	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.01	-0.41

Drawdowns

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, which is greater than 3190.HK's maximum drawdown of -16.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and 3190.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	2B7C.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.33%	-16.51%	-24.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-8.25%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.66%	-12.08%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-4.50%	+4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-4.80%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.11%	-0.36%

Volatility

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2B7C.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	3.57%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.98%	11.23%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.45%	15.71%	-1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	19.44%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	19.44%	-0.09%

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 3190.HK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

2B7C.DE vs. 3190.HK - Dividend Comparison

2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 3190.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
3190.HK Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF	6.02%	6.12%	6.82%	8.53%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2B7C.DE and 3190.HK in my portfolio?

2B7C.DE and 3190.HK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 2B7C.DE or 3190.HK?

On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2B7C.DE or 3190.HK?

2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for 3190.HK.

What is the main difference between 2B7C.DE and 3190.HK?

2B7C.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while 3190.HK is Dividend. 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while 3190.HK tracks Hang Seng Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong (Selected Corporations) High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fubon. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7C.DE and 0.60% for 3190.HK.