PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3190.HK vs. ALAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3190.HK is traded in HKD, while ALAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ALAG.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3190.HK achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than ALAG.L's 10.98% return.


3190.HK

1D
-1.13%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
7.99%
6M
5.12%
1Y
28.91%
3Y*
25.98%
5Y*
10Y*

ALAG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
10.98%
6M
9.47%
1Y
37.11%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3190.HK
Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF
7.99%39.96%34.75%12.15%-1.45%
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
10.98%55.50%-26.94%31.68%9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between 3190.HK and ALAG.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022

0.17

The correlation between 3190.HK and ALAG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3190.HK
3190.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
3190.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3190.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3190.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3190.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
3190.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3190.HKALAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.18

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

8.87

+2.08

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3190.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3190.HK and ALAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3190.HKALAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.87

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.36

+0.91

Drawdowns

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3190.HK drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum ALAG.L drawdown of -55.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3190.HK and ALAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3190.HKALAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-55.04%

+37.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-11.62%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-27.60%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-11.57%

+7.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-13.35%

+8.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

4.17%

-1.49%

Volatility

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK) is 3.28%, while Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that 3190.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3190.HKALAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

5.92%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

17.24%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

19.79%

-5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

22.34%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

26.17%

-7.46%

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3190.HK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

3190.HK vs. ALAG.L - Dividend Comparison

3190.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, while ALAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
3190.HK
Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF
6.02%6.12%6.82%8.53%3.11%
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


3190.HK and ALAG.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for 3190.HK.

3190.HK is categorized as Dividend, while ALAG.L is Latin America Equities. 3190.HK tracks Hang Seng Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong (Selected Corporations) High Dividend Yield Index, while ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fubon and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for 3190.HK and 0.10% for ALAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3190.HK and ALAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer