PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
6.73%6.91%23.72%13.89%10.30%
XSXD.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
-2.77%4.89%32.52%22.75%0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than XSXD.DE's -2.77% return.


2B7C.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
6.73%
6M
8.80%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*

XSXD.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
-2.77%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
10.56%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XSXD.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XSXD.DE
XSXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XSXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XSXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7C.DEXSXD.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.61

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

0.93

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.39

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.70

8.11

+1.59

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the XSXD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7C.DE and XSXD.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7C.DEXSXD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.61

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.96

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and XSXD.DE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSXD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


TTM2025202420232022
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSXD.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
0.95%0.94%1.09%1.30%0.38%

Drawdowns

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, which is greater than XSXD.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and XSXD.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7C.DEXSXD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.33%

-23.31%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.50%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-4.97%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-4.55%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.09%

+0.50%

Volatility

2B7C.DE vs. XSXD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXD.DE) at 3.62%. This indicates that 2B7C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2B7C.DEXSXD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

3.62%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

8.60%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

17.14%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

14.75%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

14.75%

+4.64%