2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L
2B79.DE (iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF) and HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B79.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation, while HMEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B79.DE returned 1.74%/yr vs 5.58%/yr for HMEF.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B79.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMEF.L.
Performance
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
2B79.DE is traded in EUR, while HMEF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMEF.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B79.DE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than HMEF.L's 26.64% return.
2B79.DE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- -3.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
HMEF.L
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 26.64%
- 6M
- 28.58%
- 1Y
- 47.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B79.DE iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF | 1.48% | -6.47% | 29.11% | 28.57% | -32.56% | 8.74% | 28.52% | 29.93% | -1.19% | 12.33% |
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 26.66% | 15.53% | 11.57% | 1.96% | -17.10% | 2.14% | 6.56% | 17.36% | -12.52% | 18.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B79.DE and HMEF.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between 2B79.DE and HMEF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank
2B79.DE
HMEF.L
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B79.DE | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.48 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 4.31 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 15.29 | -15.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B79.DE | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 2.64 | -2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.33 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.27 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B79.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, roughly equal to the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B79.DE and HMEF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B79.DE | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.40% | -37.16% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -10.90% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.88% | -17.77% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.40% | -27.07% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.25% | -2.73% | -10.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -12.19% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.03% | 3.08% | +6.95% |
Volatility
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) is 5.57%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that 2B79.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B79.DE | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 7.53% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 15.02% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 17.83% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 16.79% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 18.30% | +1.50% |
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B79.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HMEF.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B79.DE vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison
2B79.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B79.DE iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2B79.DE and HMEF.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B79.DE.
2B79.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while HMEF.L is Emerging Markets Equities. 2B79.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation, while HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B79.DE and 0.15% for HMEF.L.
Find the right allocation for 2B79.DE and HMEF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer