2807.HK vs. SLJY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) and SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2807.HK is a Robotics fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while SLJY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. 2807.HK is passively managed, while SLJY is actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2807.HK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SLJY.

Performance

2807.HK vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2807.HK is traded in HKD, while SLJY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLJY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2807.HK achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than SLJY's -1.60% return.

2807.HK

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

SLJY

• 1D: -9.87%
• 1M: -11.31%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2807.HK vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	10.81%	12.33%
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	-1.60%	43.10%

Correlation

The correlation between 2807.HK and SLJY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

2807.HK vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 38
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 36
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2807.HK vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2807.HK	SLJY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2807.HK	SLJY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	1.07	-0.99

Drawdowns

2807.HK vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2807.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.88%, which is greater than SLJY's maximum drawdown of -30.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2807.HK and SLJY.

Drawdown Indicators

	2807.HK	SLJY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.88%	-30.51%	-21.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.63%	-28.78%	+17.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.87%	-9.69%	-17.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	2807.HK	SLJY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.89%	50.65%	-21.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.63%	50.65%	-18.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.73%	50.65%	-17.92%

2807.HK vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison

2807.HK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

2807.HK vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison

2807.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.41%.

Position	TTM	2025
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	18.41%	6.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2807.HK and SLJY in my portfolio?

2807.HK and SLJY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 2807.HK or SLJY?

On fees, 2807.HK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2807.HK or SLJY?

2807.HK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.

What is the main difference between 2807.HK and SLJY?

2807.HK is categorized as Robotics, while SLJY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for 2807.HK and 0.75% for SLJY.