PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2628.HK vs. 0966.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd (0966.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2628.HK achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than 0966.HK's 5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, 2628.HK has outperformed 0966.HK with an annualized return of 8.62%, while 0966.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.94% annualized return.


2628.HK

1D
0.36%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
2.26%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
73.83%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
8.62%

0966.HK

1D
-1.01%
1M
-13.68%
YTD
5.03%
6M
4.92%
1Y
57.35%
3Y*
37.46%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2628.HK
China Life Insurance Co Ltd
2.26%93.31%53.87%-21.34%9.90%-20.56%-17.66%31.45%-30.74%22.86%
0966.HK
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd
5.03%64.51%79.37%-28.52%-4.44%-20.89%-26.28%-9.71%-26.31%84.05%

Correlation

The correlation between 2628.HK and 0966.HK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2003

0.59

The correlation between 2628.HK and 0966.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2628.HK
2628.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
2628.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2628.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
2628.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
2628.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
2628.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

0966.HK
0966.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
0966.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0966.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
0966.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
0966.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
0966.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd (0966.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2628.HK0966.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.51

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

5.40

+1.36

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2628.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the 0966.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2628.HK and 0966.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2628.HK0966.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.54

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.26

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.12

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.24

+0.06

Drawdowns

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2628.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, smaller than the maximum 0966.HK drawdown of -82.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2628.HK and 0966.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2628.HK0966.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.88%

-82.82%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.36%

-25.49%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.64%

-39.79%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.74%

-57.93%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.99%

-82.82%

+19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.17%

-32.01%

+10.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.10%

-38.79%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.71%

11.72%

-0.01%

Volatility

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) is 7.69%, while China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd (0966.HK) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that 2628.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0966.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2628.HK0966.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

9.43%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.64%

28.85%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.09%

41.77%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.90%

41.74%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.94%

40.70%

-6.76%

Dividends

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Dividend Comparison

2628.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than 0966.HK's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0966.HK
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd
1.78%1.87%2.58%3.87%4.73%3.74%2.15%0.52%0.47%0.34%0.00%0.00%
2628.HK
China Life Insurance Co Ltd
2.69%2.75%4.68%5.27%5.68%5.95%4.67%0.84%2.94%1.11%2.46%2.02%

Financials

2628.HK vs. 0966.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Life Insurance Co Ltd and China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


2628.HK and 0966.HK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2628.HK and 0966.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer