2628.HK vs. 2318.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and Ping An Insurance (2318.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2628.HK or 2318.HK.
Key characteristics
| 2628.HK | 2318.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.02% | 13.58% |
| 1Y Return | -20.38% | -27.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.40% | -17.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.85% | -11.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -2.53% | 6.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.60 | -0.75 |
| Daily Std Dev | 36.25% | 38.03% |
| Max Drawdown | -76.87% | -79.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -67.21% | -54.64% |
Fundamentals
| 2628.HK | 2318.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$798.82B | HK$805.28B |
| EPS | HK$0.29 | HK$5.23 |
| PE Ratio | 16.06 | 8.20 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.32 | 0.43 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$740.01B | HK$902.02B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$123.66B | HK$332.28B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | HK$29.46B | HK$155.90B |
Correlation
The correlation between 2628.HK and 2318.HK is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
2628.HK vs. 2318.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 2628.HK achieves a 15.02% return, which is significantly higher than 2318.HK's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, 2628.HK has underperformed 2318.HK with an annualized return of -2.53%, while 2318.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 6.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2628.HK vs. 2318.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and Ping An Insurance (2318.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2628.HK vs. 2318.HK - Dividend Comparison
2628.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than 2318.HK's 6.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2628.HK China Life Insurance Co Ltd | 4.58% | 5.27% | 5.68% | 5.95% | 4.67% | 0.84% | 2.94% | 1.11% | 2.46% | 2.02% | 1.24% | 0.73% |
2318.HK Ping An Insurance | 6.76% | 7.68% | 5.55% | 4.86% | 2.44% | 2.30% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.98% | 1.11% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
2628.HK vs. 2318.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2628.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, roughly equal to the maximum 2318.HK drawdown of -79.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2628.HK and 2318.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2628.HK vs. 2318.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) is 10.10%, while Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that 2628.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2318.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
2628.HK vs. 2318.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Life Insurance Co Ltd and Ping An Insurance. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities