2628.HK vs. 6060.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd (6060.HK).
Performance
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2628.HK achieves a -8.69% return, which is significantly higher than 6060.HK's -20.63% return.
2628.HK
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -12.65%
- YTD
- -8.69%
- 6M
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 70.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
6060.HK
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- -20.63%
- 6M
- -29.56%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- -20.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.64%
- 10Y*
- —
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2628.HK China Life Insurance Co Ltd | -8.69% | 93.31% | 53.87% | -21.34% | 9.90% | -20.56% | -17.66% | 31.45% | -30.74% | 5.59% |
6060.HK ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd | -20.63% | 37.05% | -34.19% | -17.02% | -20.66% | -25.14% | 28.83% | 12.18% | -63.85% | 6.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2628.HK and 6060.HK is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK — Risk / Return Rank
2628.HK
6060.HK
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd (6060.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2628.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.07 | +1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 0.61 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.08 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 0.01 | +2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 0.03 | +7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2628.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.07 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | -0.41 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.30 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2628.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.90%, smaller than the maximum 6060.HK drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2628.HK and 6060.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2628.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.90% | -89.95% | +13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.36% | -41.78% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.74% | -81.10% | +36.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.62% | -86.36% | +56.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.30% | -69.22% | +24.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.20% | 21.85% | -12.65% |
Volatility
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Volatility Comparison
China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) has a higher volatility of 14.12% compared to ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd (6060.HK) at 10.72%. This indicates that 2628.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6060.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2628.HK | 6060.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.12% | 10.72% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.64% | 23.36% | +8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.22% | 60.44% | -18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.55% | 58.84% | -21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.81% | 59.27% | -25.46% |
Dividends
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Dividend Comparison
2628.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while 6060.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2628.HK China Life Insurance Co Ltd | 3.01% | 2.75% | 4.68% | 5.27% | 5.68% | 5.95% | 4.67% | 0.84% | 2.94% | 1.11% | 2.46% | 2.02% |
6060.HK ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
2628.HK vs. 6060.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Life Insurance Co Ltd and ZhongAn Online P & C Insurance Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities