PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0966.HK vs. 1336.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd (0966.HK) and New China Life Insurance (1336.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0966.HK achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly higher than 1336.HK's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, 0966.HK has underperformed 1336.HK with an annualized return of 4.94%, while 1336.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


0966.HK

1D
-1.01%
1M
-13.68%
YTD
5.03%
6M
4.92%
1Y
57.35%
3Y*
37.46%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
4.94%

1336.HK

1D
-3.09%
1M
-8.88%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-4.43%
1Y
39.71%
3Y*
41.74%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0966.HK
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd
5.03%64.51%79.37%-28.52%-4.44%-20.89%-26.28%-9.71%-26.31%84.05%
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
-13.49%146.51%68.38%-15.52%-0.67%-25.84%-6.00%10.32%-40.62%52.03%

Correlation

The correlation between 0966.HK and 1336.HK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011

0.72

The correlation between 0966.HK and 1336.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0966.HK
0966.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
0966.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0966.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
0966.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
0966.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
0966.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

1336.HK
1336.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
1336.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1336.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
1336.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
1336.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
1336.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd (0966.HK) and New China Life Insurance (1336.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0966.HK1336.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.56

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

3.47

+1.94

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0966.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the 1336.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0966.HK and 1336.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0966.HK1336.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.20

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.46

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.28

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.21

+0.04

Drawdowns

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0966.HK drawdown since its inception was -82.82%, which is greater than 1336.HK's maximum drawdown of -71.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0966.HK and 1336.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0966.HK1336.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.82%

-71.90%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.49%

-30.22%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.79%

-43.61%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.93%

-49.06%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.82%

-71.90%

-10.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.01%

-27.83%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-34.93%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

13.44%

-1.72%

Volatility

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Volatility Comparison

China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd (0966.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) at 7.03%. This indicates that 0966.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1336.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0966.HK1336.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

7.03%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.85%

26.23%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.77%

39.43%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.74%

42.73%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.70%

39.64%

+1.06%

Dividends

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Dividend Comparison

0966.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than 1336.HK's 6.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0966.HK
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd
1.78%1.87%2.58%3.87%4.73%3.74%2.15%0.52%0.47%0.34%0.00%0.00%
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
6.20%5.36%6.46%7.74%8.84%8.00%5.13%2.62%2.02%1.03%0.93%0.82%

Financials

0966.HK vs. 1336.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co Ltd and New China Life Insurance. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


0966.HK and 1336.HK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0966.HK and 1336.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer