PortfoliosLab logo
2628.HK vs. 1299.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 2628.HK and 1299.HK is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

2628.HK:

0.90

1299.HK:

0.04

Sortino Ratio

2628.HK:

1.70

1299.HK:

1.03

Omega Ratio

2628.HK:

1.26

1299.HK:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

2628.HK:

0.86

1299.HK:

0.40

Martin Ratio

2628.HK:

2.87

1299.HK:

1.05

Ulcer Index

2628.HK:

21.12%

1299.HK:

19.37%

Daily Std Dev

2628.HK:

50.28%

1299.HK:

33.87%

Max Drawdown

2628.HK:

-76.87%

1299.HK:

-55.41%

Current Drawdown

2628.HK:

-53.40%

1299.HK:

-37.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

2628.HK:

HK$956.78B

1299.HK:

HK$660.06B

EPS

2628.HK:

HK$0.00

1299.HK:

HK$0.00

PE Ratio

2628.HK:

3.43

1299.HK:

12.93

PEG Ratio

2628.HK:

0.35

1299.HK:

0.94

PS Ratio

2628.HK:

3.11

1299.HK:

29.37

PB Ratio

2628.HK:

0.74

1299.HK:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

2628.HK:

HK$339.40B

1299.HK:

HK$10.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

2628.HK:

HK$109.63B

1299.HK:

HK$10.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

2628.HK:

HK$18.01B

1299.HK:

HK$837.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2628.HK achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than 1299.HK's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, 2628.HK has underperformed 1299.HK with an annualized return of -5.10%, while 1299.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 4.01% annualized return.


2628.HK

YTD

6.25%

1M

17.95%

6M

-10.11%

1Y

43.12%

5Y*

5.41%

10Y*

-5.10%

1299.HK

YTD

12.36%

1M

26.02%

6M

2.02%

1Y

1.22%

5Y*

0.09%

10Y*

4.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2628.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 2628.HK is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 2628.HK is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 2628.HK is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 2628.HK is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 2628.HK is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 2628.HK is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

1299.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 1299.HK is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 1299.HK is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 1299.HK is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 1299.HK is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 1299.HK is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 1299.HK is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) and AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 2628.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the 1299.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2628.HK and 1299.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK - Dividend Comparison

2628.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than 1299.HK's 2.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
2628.HK
China Life Insurance Co Ltd
4.41%4.68%5.27%5.68%5.95%4.67%0.84%2.94%1.11%2.46%2.02%1.24%
1299.HK
AIA Group Ltd
2.59%2.91%2.29%1.71%1.76%1.34%0.52%1.59%1.34%1.67%1.13%1.03%

Drawdowns

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2628.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, which is greater than 1299.HK's maximum drawdown of -55.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2628.HK and 1299.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) is 6.51%, while AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that 2628.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1299.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

2628.HK vs. 1299.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Life Insurance Co Ltd and AIA Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B20212022202320242025
61.19B
10.29B
(2628.HK) Total Revenue
(1299.HK) Total Revenue
Values in HKD except per share items