PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1MC.MI vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1MC.MI is traded in EUR, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1MC.MI achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 22.88% return.


1MC.MI

1D
-2.68%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-24.78%
6M
-25.47%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-15.71%
5Y*
-4.61%
10Y*
14.59%

QQQM

1D
0.00%
1M
11.49%
YTD
22.88%
6M
20.44%
1Y
39.19%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
1MC.MI
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-24.78%1.76%-13.18%10.77%-4.82%43.17%24.50%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
22.85%6.51%33.98%50.36%-28.34%36.98%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between 1MC.MI and QQQM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1MC.MI vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1MC.MI
1MC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1MC.MIQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

3.58

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

11.22

-11.22

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1MC.MI and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1MC.MIQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

2.44

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.88

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.87

-0.49

Drawdowns

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1MC.MI drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1MC.MI and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1MC.MIQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.11%

-30.95%

-24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.60%

-10.99%

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.21%

-27.16%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.57%

-30.95%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.26%

0.00%

-44.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-7.34%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.05%

3.50%

+11.55%

Volatility

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 3.68%. This indicates that 1MC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1MC.MIQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

3.68%

+6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.25%

11.45%

+10.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.57%

16.16%

+17.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.82%

21.90%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

21.72%

+6.85%

Dividends

1MC.MI vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

1MC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1MC.MI
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.81%2.08%2.07%2.44%1.76%0.96%1.79%1.49%2.14%1.70%2.01%2.23%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


1MC.MI and QQQM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1MC.MI and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer