PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1MC.MI vs. HESAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Hermes International SA (HESAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1MC.MI is traded in EUR, while HESAY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HESAY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 1MC.MI having a -24.78% return and HESAY slightly lower at -25.23%. Over the past 10 years, 1MC.MI has underperformed HESAY with an annualized return of 14.59%, while HESAY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return.


1MC.MI

1D
-2.68%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-24.78%
6M
-25.47%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-15.71%
5Y*
-4.61%
10Y*
14.59%

HESAY

1D
-2.58%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-25.23%
6M
-25.18%
1Y
-33.97%
3Y*
-6.25%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
18.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1MC.MI
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-24.78%1.76%-13.18%10.77%-4.82%43.17%27.08%66.96%4.34%40.50%
HESAY
Hermes International SA
-25.23%-7.61%21.20%34.13%-5.73%75.26%32.49%40.66%8.96%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between 1MC.MI and HESAY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2009

0.44

The correlation between 1MC.MI and HESAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1MC.MI vs. HESAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1MC.MI
1MC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HESAY
HESAY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HESAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HESAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HESAY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HESAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HESAY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Hermes International SA (HESAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1MC.MIHESAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.80

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

-0.95

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

-1.75

+1.75

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the HESAY Sharpe Ratio of -1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1MC.MI and HESAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1MC.MIHESAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

-1.18

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.24

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.69

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.53

-0.15

Drawdowns

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1MC.MI drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than HESAY's maximum drawdown of -44.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1MC.MI and HESAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1MC.MIHESAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.11%

-44.17%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.60%

-35.99%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.21%

-44.17%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.57%

-44.17%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

-44.17%

-4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.26%

-44.17%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-10.01%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.05%

19.41%

-4.36%

Volatility

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Hermes International SA (HESAY) at 8.51%. This indicates that 1MC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HESAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1MC.MIHESAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

8.51%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.25%

22.36%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.57%

28.99%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.82%

29.39%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

26.36%

+2.21%

Dividends

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Dividend Comparison

1MC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than HESAY's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1MC.MI
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.81%2.08%2.07%2.44%1.76%0.96%1.79%1.49%2.14%1.70%2.01%2.23%
HESAY
Hermes International SA
1.15%1.18%1.13%0.67%0.57%0.31%0.46%0.68%0.91%1.55%1.81%2.54%

Financials

1MC.MI vs. HESAY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Hermes International SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 1MC.MI values in EUR, HESAY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


1MC.MI and HESAY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1MC.MI and HESAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer