1MC.MI vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1MC.MI (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, 1MC.MI returned 14.70%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1MC.MI is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1MC.MI achieves a -23.38% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, 1MC.MI has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.70%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.

1MC.MI

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: -23.38%
• 6M: -24.36%
• 1Y: -1.83%
• 3Y*: -14.65%
• 5Y*: -4.26%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 22.19%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1MC.MI LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne	-23.38%	1.76%	-13.18%	10.77%	-4.82%	43.17%	27.08%	66.96%	4.34%	40.50%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	8.00%	3.56%	43.86%	45.60%	-27.58%	37.70%	27.67%	39.09%	3.27%	12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between 1MC.MI and SCHG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.28

The correlation between 1MC.MI and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1MC.MI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1MC.MI

1MC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 37
1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
1MC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
1MC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 34
1MC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
1MC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1MC.MI	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.41	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	1.87	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.25	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	1.42	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.12	4.12	-4.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1MC.MI and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1MC.MI	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	1.41	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.76	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.85	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.91	-0.52

Drawdowns

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1MC.MI drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1MC.MI and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	1MC.MI	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.11%	-31.88%	-23.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.60%	-15.64%	-14.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.21%	-28.18%	-20.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.57%	-30.34%	-18.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.57%	-31.88%	-16.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.22%	-1.46%	-41.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-5.23%	-6.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.08%	5.40%	+9.68%

Volatility

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.18%. This indicates that 1MC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1MC.MI	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.34%	3.18%	+5.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.31%	11.13%	+11.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.61%	15.84%	+17.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.83%	21.97%	+8.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.57%	21.86%	+6.71%

Dividends

1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

1MC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1MC.MI LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne	2.76%	2.08%	2.07%	2.44%	1.76%	0.96%	1.79%	1.49%	2.14%	1.70%	2.01%	2.23%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1MC.MI and SCHG in my portfolio?

1MC.MI and SCHG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.