1MC.MI vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1MC.MI LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -24.61% | 1.76% | -13.18% | 10.77% | -4.82% | 43.17% | 27.08% | 66.96% | 4.34% | 40.50% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -8.34% | 3.56% | 43.86% | 45.60% | -27.58% | 37.70% | 27.67% | 39.09% | 3.27% | 12.31% |
Different Trading Currencies
1MC.MI is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1MC.MI achieves a -24.61% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, 1MC.MI has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.43%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.77% annualized return.
1MC.MI
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -24.61%
- 6M
- -9.36%
- 1Y
- -16.17%
- 3Y*
- -15.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -8.34%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1MC.MI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
1MC.MI
SCHG
1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 1MC.MI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | 0.37 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | 0.69 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.10 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.66 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 1.83 | -2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 1MC.MI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | 0.37 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.60 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.86 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between 1MC.MI and SCHG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
1MC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1MC.MI LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.76% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 1.79% | 1.49% | 2.14% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 2.23% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1MC.MI drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1MC.MI and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1MC.MI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.11% | -34.59% | -20.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.47% | -16.41% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.57% | -34.59% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.57% | -34.59% | -13.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.13% | -12.51% | -31.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -5.22% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.08% | 4.84% | +9.24% |
Volatility
1MC.MI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.83%. This indicates that 1MC.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 1MC.MI | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 5.83% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.61% | 12.82% | +11.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.99% | 24.67% | +11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 22.00% | +8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.45% | 21.88% | +6.57% |