18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L
18MF.DE (Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - 18MF.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index (200%), while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 18MF.DE returned 25.16%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 18MF.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
18MF.DE is traded in EUR, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 18MF.DE achieves a 17.87% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, 18MF.DE has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 25.16%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.88% annualized return.
18MF.DE
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 17.87%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 48.17%
- 3Y*
- 30.59%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 25.16%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.20%
- 1M
- -11.14%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 86.21%
- 3Y*
- 38.05%
- 5Y*
- 20.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18MF.DE Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF | 17.87% | 1.66% | 64.14% | 43.16% | -33.46% | 88.21% | 5.26% | 77.73% | -5.67% | 12.00% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -4.19% | 118.25% | 29.15% | -4.21% | 9.79% | -6.09% | 33.38% | 19.85% | -4.67% | -9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between 18MF.DE and SSLN.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.10 |
The correlation between 18MF.DE and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
18MF.DE
SSLN.L
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 18MF.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.04 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 4.54 | +6.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 18MF.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -77.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MF.DE and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 18MF.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -77.65% | +18.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -41.88% | +27.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.91% | -41.88% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.91% | -41.88% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.64% | -42.00% | -17.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -38.86% | +35.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -58.14% | +48.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 18.84% | -14.56% |
Volatility
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) is 6.37%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that 18MF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 18MF.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 14.60% | -8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 52.55% | -36.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.75% | 55.32% | -31.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 36.78% | -5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 31.04% | +1.50% |
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
18MF.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
18MF.DE vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 18MF.DE nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
18MF.DE and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for 18MF.DE.
18MF.DE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. 18MF.DE tracks MSCI USA Index (200%), while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for 18MF.DE and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for 18MF.DE and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer