1810.HK vs. PYPL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) and PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. 1810.HK operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, 1810.HK returned -1.43%/yr vs -31.06%/yr for PYPL. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1810.HK is traded in HKD, while PYPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PYPL values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than PYPL's -27.93% return.

1810.HK

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -17.61%
• YTD: -33.33%
• 6M: -39.01%
• 1Y: -49.81%
• 3Y*: 33.79%
• 5Y*: -1.43%
• 10Y*: —

PYPL

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -7.82%
• YTD: -27.93%
• 6M: -31.77%
• 1Y: -44.11%
• 3Y*: -12.97%
• 5Y*: -31.06%
• 10Y*: 1.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-33.33%	13.91%	121.15%	42.60%	-42.12%	-42.81%	206.59%	-16.56%	-22.17%
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc.	-27.93%	-31.31%	38.27%	-13.78%	-62.17%	-19.04%	115.54%	27.96%	-2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 1810.HK and PYPL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018	0.10

Return for Risk

1810.HK vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6

PYPL

PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 5
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	1810.HK	PYPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.43	-1.13	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.36	-1.53	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	0.79	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.88	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	-1.53	+0.02

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is comparable to the PYPL Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1810.HK and PYPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and PYPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	1810.HK	PYPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.06%	-87.23%	+11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.04%	-50.14%	-6.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.04%	-57.17%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.66%	-87.23%	+16.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.44%	-86.31%	+29.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.06%	-35.81%	-6.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.21%	28.88%	+4.33%

Volatility

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 7.02%. This indicates that 1810.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1810.HK	PYPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.01%	7.02%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.27%	31.71%	-5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.47%	39.11%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.12%	42.08%	+2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.76%	38.75%	+7.01%

Dividends

1810.HK vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison

1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	0.00%	0.00%
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc.	1.01%	0.24%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1810.HK and PYPL in my portfolio?

1810.HK and PYPL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.