1810.HK vs. 9988.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK).

Performance

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-21.42%	13.42%	122.12%	42.60%	-42.12%	-42.81%	206.59%	25.06%
9988.HK Alibaba Group Holding Ltd	-17.02%	73.87%	11.01%	-11.14%	-27.46%	-48.79%	12.07%	10.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -21.42% return, which is significantly lower than 9988.HK's -17.02% return.

1810.HK

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -21.42%
• 6M: -44.66%
• 1Y: -30.68%
• 3Y*: 36.43%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —

9988.HK

• 1D: -3.42%
• 1M: -12.09%
• YTD: -17.02%
• 6M: -35.28%
• 1Y: -8.05%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: -11.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 10
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 13
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

9988.HK

9988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 32
9988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
9988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
9988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 30
9988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
9988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1810.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	-0.17	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	0.11	-0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.01	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.18	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.62	-0.41	-1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the 9988.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1810.HK and 9988.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1810.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	-0.17	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	-0.23	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	-0.13	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between 1810.HK and 9988.HK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Dividend Comparison

1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 9988.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
9988.HK Alibaba Group Holding Ltd	0.87%	0.72%	1.18%	1.29%

Drawdowns

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, roughly equal to the maximum 9988.HK drawdown of -80.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and 9988.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	1810.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.06%	-80.01%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.66%	-35.98%	-12.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.83%	-74.16%	+2.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.66%	-60.07%	+11.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.92%	-51.85%	+9.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.96%	15.74%	+10.22%

Volatility

1810.HK vs. 9988.HK - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK) have volatilities of 13.65% and 14.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1810.HK	9988.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.65%	14.04%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.82%	29.88%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.70%	49.24%	-5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.02%	51.63%	-7.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.98%	49.42%	-3.44%

Financials