PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1336.HK vs. 2628.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) and China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1336.HK achieves a -15.58% return, which is significantly lower than 2628.HK's -8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, 1336.HK has outperformed 2628.HK with an annualized return of 10.65%, while 2628.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.


1336.HK

1D
-2.30%
1M
-12.28%
YTD
-15.58%
6M
1.95%
1Y
59.89%
3Y*
43.58%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
10.65%

2628.HK

1D
-0.79%
1M
-12.65%
YTD
-8.69%
6M
14.80%
1Y
70.93%
3Y*
30.30%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
6.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
-15.58%146.51%68.38%-15.52%-0.67%-25.84%-6.00%10.32%-40.62%52.03%
2628.HK
China Life Insurance Co Ltd
-8.69%93.31%53.87%-21.34%9.90%-20.56%-17.66%31.45%-30.74%22.86%

Correlation

The correlation between 1336.HK and 2628.HK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1336.HK
1336.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
1336.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1336.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
1336.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
1336.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
1336.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

2628.HK
2628.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
2628.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2628.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
2628.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
2628.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
2628.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) and China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1336.HK2628.HKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.63

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.06

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.10

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

7.16

+0.20

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1336.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the 2628.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1336.HK and 2628.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1336.HK2628.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.63

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.40

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.21

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.29

-0.09

Drawdowns

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1336.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.90%, smaller than the maximum 2628.HK drawdown of -76.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1336.HK and 2628.HK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


1336.HK2628.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.90%

-76.90%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.22%

-31.36%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.81%

-44.74%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.90%

-62.99%

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.58%

-29.62%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-44.30%

+9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.19%

9.20%

+0.99%

Volatility

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) is 12.09%, while China Life Insurance Co Ltd (2628.HK) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that 1336.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2628.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


1336.HK2628.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.09%

14.12%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.53%

31.64%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.71%

42.22%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.47%

37.55%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.51%

33.81%

+5.70%

Dividends

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Dividend Comparison

1336.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than 2628.HK's 3.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
6.35%5.36%6.46%7.74%8.84%8.00%5.13%2.62%2.02%1.03%0.93%0.82%
2628.HK
China Life Insurance Co Ltd
3.01%2.75%4.68%5.27%5.68%5.95%4.67%0.84%2.94%1.11%2.46%2.02%

Financials

1336.HK vs. 2628.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New China Life Insurance and China Life Insurance Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items