1336.HK vs. CS.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) and AXA SA (CS.PA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 1336.HK or CS.PA.
Correlation
The correlation between 1336.HK and CS.PA is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
1336.HK vs. CS.PA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
1336.HK:
1.88
CS.PA:
1.44
1336.HK:
2.50
CS.PA:
1.78
1336.HK:
1.39
CS.PA:
1.26
1336.HK:
1.99
CS.PA:
2.16
1336.HK:
6.33
CS.PA:
5.90
1336.HK:
20.71%
CS.PA:
4.85%
1336.HK:
63.31%
CS.PA:
20.74%
1336.HK:
-71.90%
CS.PA:
-82.46%
1336.HK:
-20.91%
CS.PA:
-0.02%
Fundamentals
1336.HK:
HK$137.32B
CS.PA:
€88.87B
1336.HK:
HK$1.97
CS.PA:
€3.25
1336.HK:
3.15
CS.PA:
12.57
1336.HK:
0.23
CS.PA:
1.21
1336.HK:
1.79
CS.PA:
0.98
1336.HK:
1.07
CS.PA:
1.84
1336.HK:
HK$82.19B
CS.PA:
€81.81B
1336.HK:
HK$28.81B
CS.PA:
€91.22B
1336.HK:
HK$6.51B
CS.PA:
€5.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1336.HK achieves a 29.09% return, which is significantly higher than CS.PA's 26.22% return. Over the past 10 years, 1336.HK has underperformed CS.PA with an annualized return of -1.52%, while CS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.
1336.HK
29.09%
17.37%
4.92%
113.15%
9.77%
-1.52%
CS.PA
26.22%
18.91%
26.93%
30.17%
28.27%
12.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
1336.HK vs. CS.PA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
1336.HK
CS.PA
1336.HK vs. CS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) and AXA SA (CS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
1336.HK vs. CS.PA - Dividend Comparison
1336.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than CS.PA's 5.23% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1336.HK New China Life Insurance | 5.00% | 6.46% | 7.74% | 8.84% | 8.00% | 5.13% | 2.62% | 2.02% | 1.03% | 0.93% | 0.82% | 0.48% |
CS.PA AXA SA | 5.23% | 5.77% | 5.76% | 5.91% | 5.46% | 3.74% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.69% | 4.59% | 3.77% | 4.22% |
Drawdowns
1336.HK vs. CS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1336.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.90%, smaller than the maximum CS.PA drawdown of -82.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1336.HK and CS.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
1336.HK vs. CS.PA - Volatility Comparison
New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) has a higher volatility of 21.34% compared to AXA SA (CS.PA) at 12.14%. This indicates that 1336.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
1336.HK vs. CS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New China Life Insurance and AXA SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities