PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
1336.HK vs. 1883.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


1336.HK1883.HK
YTD Return-5.91%-19.51%
1Y Return-26.66%-10.20%
3Y Return (Ann)-16.54%6.30%
5Y Return (Ann)-15.96%3.51%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.23%6.23%
Sharpe Ratio-0.73-0.51
Daily Std Dev35.30%23.48%
Max Drawdown-71.90%-85.68%
Current Drawdown-65.77%-19.76%

Fundamentals


1336.HK1883.HK
Market CapHK$81.60BHK$9.36B
EPSHK$2.87HK$0.00
PE Ratio4.507.67
PEG Ratio0.610.00
Revenue (TTM)HK$45.55BHK$9.99B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$19.87BHK$4.04B
EBITDA (TTM)HK$9.57BHK$2.40B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between 1336.HK and 1883.HK is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 1336.HK achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly higher than 1883.HK's -19.51% return. Over the past 10 years, 1336.HK has underperformed 1883.HK with an annualized return of -1.23%, while 1883.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 6.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-20.85%
280.50%
1336.HK
1883.HK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


New China Life Insurance

CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) and CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd (1883.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1336.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 1336.HK, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 1336.HK, currently valued at -1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 1336.HK, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.89
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 1336.HK, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00-0.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 1336.HK, currently valued at -0.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.98
1883.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 1883.HK, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 1883.HK, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 1883.HK, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 1883.HK, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00-0.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 1883.HK, currently valued at -1.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.34

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1336.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the 1883.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 1336.HK and 1883.HK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.76
-0.55
1336.HK
1883.HK

Dividends

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Dividend Comparison

1336.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, less than 1883.HK's 9.28% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
1336.HK
New China Life Insurance
8.23%7.74%8.84%8.00%5.13%2.62%2.02%1.03%0.93%0.82%0.48%0.00%
1883.HK
CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd
9.28%7.47%8.68%8.14%8.20%6.69%6.18%6.45%5.39%3.85%3.54%3.59%

Drawdowns

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1336.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.90%, smaller than the maximum 1883.HK drawdown of -85.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1336.HK and 1883.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-65.82%
-19.94%
1336.HK
1883.HK

Volatility

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Volatility Comparison

New China Life Insurance (1336.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd (1883.HK) at 5.87%. This indicates that 1336.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1883.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
9.91%
5.87%
1336.HK
1883.HK

Financials

1336.HK vs. 1883.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New China Life Insurance and CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in HKD except per share items