1171.HK vs. 1898.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1171.HK (Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK) and 1898.HK (China Coal Energy) are both stocks. Both operate in the Thermal Coal industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, 1171.HK returned 34.38%/yr vs 19.00%/yr for 1898.HK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) and China Coal Energy (1898.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1171.HK achieves a 64.45% return, which is significantly higher than 1898.HK's 33.27% return. Over the past 10 years, 1171.HK has outperformed 1898.HK with an annualized return of 34.38%, while 1898.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 19.00% annualized return.

1171.HK

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 64.45%
• 6M: 52.56%
• 1Y: 92.10%
• 3Y*: 33.81%
• 5Y*: 38.13%
• 10Y*: 34.38%

1898.HK

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -2.93%
• YTD: 33.27%
• 6M: 23.12%
• 1Y: 63.09%
• 3Y*: 37.45%
• 5Y*: 29.01%
• 10Y*: 19.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1171.HK Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK	64.45%	17.12%	-9.72%	20.44%	56.65%	167.52%	-2.20%	39.96%	-26.96%	76.17%
1898.HK China Coal Energy	33.27%	12.63%	41.72%	20.54%	48.33%	99.49%	-18.77%	3.14%	-10.94%	-2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between 1171.HK and 1898.HK is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008	0.75

The correlation between 1171.HK and 1898.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1171.HK

1171.HK Risk / Return Rank: 88
1171.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
1171.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
1171.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 85
1171.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
1171.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 88

1898.HK

1898.HK Risk / Return Rank: 83
1898.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
1898.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
1898.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 80
1898.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
1898.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) and China Coal Energy (1898.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1171.HK	1898.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.73	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.53	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.41	3.50	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.48	7.69	+2.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1171.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the 1898.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1171.HK and 1898.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1171.HK	1898.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	1.73	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.71	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.51	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.03	+0.32

Drawdowns

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1171.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.97%, roughly equal to the maximum 1898.HK drawdown of -88.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1171.HK and 1898.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	1171.HK	1898.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.97%	-88.19%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.63%	-18.01%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.01%	-32.58%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.01%	-41.75%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.48%	-58.68%	+2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-10.89%	+5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.52%	-58.54%	+19.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.50%	8.13%	+0.37%

Volatility

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Volatility Comparison

Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK (1171.HK) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to China Coal Energy (1898.HK) at 12.35%. This indicates that 1171.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1898.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1171.HK	1898.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.59%	12.35%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.01%	27.11%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.21%	36.63%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.84%	42.32%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.24%	38.01%	+8.23%

Dividends

1171.HK vs. 1898.HK - Dividend Comparison

1171.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than 1898.HK's 3.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1171.HK Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd HK	1.25%	8.17%	23.53%	33.73%	1.97%	4.69%	10.23%	24.63%	9.34%	1.50%	0.22%	0.69%
1898.HK China Coal Energy	3.50%	4.67%	7.81%	6.41%	5.55%	3.58%	5.97%	2.87%	2.17%	1.26%	0.00%	1.02%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1171.HK and 1898.HK in my portfolio?

1171.HK and 1898.HK have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.